brainrow

Media Matters observes that Pat Robertson isn’t the only right-winger dreaming of assassination and murder.

I think they’re a little bit unfair to Bill O’Reilly, though. As creepily detailed as his imagery of decapitating Michael Kinsley is, I don’t think he’s actually advocating murder here, in contrast to the other conservatives cited.

In Iraq, American soldiers are digging through scrap yards to up-armor their military vehicles with improvised “hillbilly armor.”

On the home front, this veteran brought protective equipment of his own to a George W. Bush speech on the topic of Iraq.

Good old American ingenuity.

Wow. I thought I was being nasty yesterday, poking fun at Pat Robertson’s prayer vigil asking God to remove three Supreme Court justices. I felt a little guilty for being so mean. But now, I’m worried.

The Lord, you see, moves in mysterious ways His wonders to perform. Sometimes that takes a while, and Pat Robertson is not always a patient man. Apparently he is adopting the doctrine that
the Lord helps those who help themselves:

Pat Robertson, host of Christian Broadcasting Network’s The 700 Club and founder of the Christian Coalition of America, called for the assassination of Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez.

The Bush Administration says it supports democracy around the world. Chavez was democratically elected by the people of Venezuela. But Venezuela has oil, and that changes things.

John Moltz asks, “What does Pat Robertson have to do to get de-mainstreamed?” (Rated ‘R’ for strong language.)

From his HBO program Real Time, here’s Bill Maher on Intelligent Design:

New rule: You don’t have to teach both sides of a debate if one side is a load of crap.

President Bush recently suggested that public schools should teach intelligent design alongside the theory of evolution, because, after all, evolution is “just a theory.” Then the president renewed his vow to drive the terrorists straight over the edge of the earth.

…

There aren’t necessarily two sides to every issue. If there were, the Republicans would have an opposition party. And an opposition party would point out that even though there is a debate in schools and government about this, there is no debate among scientists.

Evolution is supported by the entire scientific community. Intelligent design is supported by guys on line to see The Dukes of Hazzard. And the reason there is no real debate is that intelligent design isn’t real science. It’s the equivalent of saying that the thermos keeps hot things hot and cold things cold because it’s a god.

…

“Babies come from storks” is not a competing school of thought in medical school. We shouldn’t teach both. The media shouldn’t equate both.

During the past week, civil rights leader Coretta Scott King suffered a stroke; gold star mother Cindy Sheehan had to abandon her vigil outside President Bush’s Texas hideaway when her mother suffered a stroke, and Senate Democratic leader Harry Reid suffered a stroke.

What’s going on here?

Watch the news carefully over the next few weeks. If Donald Rumsfeld announces a successful Defense Department test of a new vascular disruption ray, or if Senate Republican leader and prominent cardiologist Bill Frist suddenly appears, unkempt and unshaven, after a mysterious week-long disappearance, we may have an important clue.

My own bet is that Pat Robertson will soon address his television audience, saying, “Focus, people! Focus! We’re only asking God to kill Supreme Court justices. For now.”

Roger Rosenblatt on the PBS NewsHour:

After the London bombings, experts there and here were asked what one can do to protect oneself — in subways, on buses, in shops — anywhere. The answer the experts gave, uniformly, was vigilance. Keep your eyes open for unattended packages, unsavory people — for the exit doors, in case of the worst.

The implication of such advice is that most people, most of the time, are not vigilant, not even casually observant. And this seems true. One saunters through the day without taking notice of the details of one’s surroundings. Now we are told to notice all we can, as the act of seeing may save our lives.

…

If Americans are to be more vigilant in their self-protection, that includes a watchfulness of one’s government, as well, to see that it does not exercise power that diminishes the freedom of those it protects. A PATRIOT Act that interferes with the free life of libraries takes away an essential kind of sight. An unattended package is no more lethal than an unattended liberty.

Molly Ivins, a few months ago, on the PBS program NOW:

Here are these people — they have all the executive power; they have all the legislative power; they’re getting all the judicial power just as fast as they can — and sitting around whining about people of faith being discriminated against. It’s silly.

…

There are those of us who are Christians who believe that the politics of the right is actually un-Christian. It’s not a hard position to hold.

Come the Revolution (already in progress), Molly Ivins will be burned at the stake for her heretical views.

Jason Spitalnick asks a pointed question about Supreme Court nominee John Roberts:

…if Democrats want to strike a chord with American voters, they’ll need to focus national attention on how John Roberts’s approach to legal questions will impact lives. If John Roberts had been the deciding vote on the Court for the entire twentieth century, what would America look like today?

The question casts light not only on Roberts and what he might do on the Court, but on the ideal world dreamed of by Bush and Company.

Yikes.

Arlo Guthrie on “Alice’s Restaurant”:

Nobody in their right mind would have expected an 18-minute monologue to have shelf life, especially in an era when radio refused to play anything that was over 2 1/2 minutes.

It’s been forty years since the true story told in the song took place. Generations have grown up without hearing it. Rats.

On the plus side, what fun to play it for someone who has never heard it before!

If you want to end war and stuff, you gotta sing loud.

MoveOn.org lets you print your own Karl Rove poster:

Al Franken:

I respect everyone else’s religious beliefs. But you know what? I expect them to respect mine.

We are a secular society, and that’s why religion has flourished in this country. That’s why this is such a religious country, why it’s so successful. And we have to maintain that separation.

If you remember the story of Bill O’Reilly’s Peabody awards from Al Franken’s book Lies and the Lying Liars Who Tell Them, it will come as no surprise to you that
Bill O’Reilly makes stuff up:

Media Matters has repeatedly debunked O’Reilly’s false claims of success regarding a French boycott. On April 27, 2004, he asserted that the boycott had cost France “billions of dollars,” citing the “Paris Business Review” as a source, but Media Matters documented that Census figures actually showed an increase in U.S. imports from France; additionally, there is no evidence of a publication named the “Paris Business Review.”

(Franken’s celebrated BookExpo run-in with O’Reilly is supposedly online here. It appears to be in RealMedia format. I can’t run it myself, because I don’t use RealPlayer.)

Annie Lamott, on the Bolton appointment:

Bush acts more and more like Bam-Bam Rubble, from the Flintstones: 4 years old, out of control—Bam! Bam! Bam! It used to work when we were still in Act II, waiting for the critical mass of lies and betrayal to be reached. But now that we are in Act III, where things are unraveling for the White House—winning CAFTA by two votes? Iraq and Iran’s new alliance?—it’s not going to help them in the long run.

Last night, on PBS’s News Hour, Abraham Sofaer, a State Department official during the Reagan Administration, defended the recess appointment of John Bolton:

He’s been Assistant Secretary of State for International Organizations, and while he was there, he was the point man on putting together the coalition on Iraq.

And in this administration, when you fail spectacularly, you get a promotion or a medal. Everybody knows that.

You may think you know what you’re dealing with, but believe me, you don’t.

—John Huston as Noah Cross, in Chinatown

A great mystery story is like skinning an onion. You peel back the lies and corruption, and expose… another layer of lies and corruption.

Think Progress cites a Time magazine report about how administration officials learned about Valerie Plame:

If these revelations are true, the least of Rove and Libby’s concerns is perjury. Today’s disclosure adds further evidence that the White House consciously dug out Plame’s identity, used it, and then engaged in a massive cover-up by pinning blame elsewhere. Moreover, it appears far more players were involved in this orchestrated, administration-wide effort than previously believed. The key question, if these revelations are true, is why did these administration officials lie so overtly to the special prosecutor? Knowing hard evidence would come out sooner or later against them (through leaks, emails, etc), the White House officials still chose to lie. What could they possibly be trying to hide? Perhaps this wasn’t just a “third-rate smear.”

PERRspectives has a list of senior officials who appear to be implicated in Rovegate or Plamegate or Traitorgate, or whatever you want to call it:

The mushrooming Karl Rove CIA outing scandal increasingly looks like it will rack up quite a body count within the White House. It was only two years ago that President Bush concluded of the Valerie Plame outing, “I don’t know if we’re going to find out the senior administration official.” Now it is beginning to appear that he will have no credible senior officials left.

In politics and business, we use dramatic language to make our little jobs seem bigger and more exciting. We’re constantly “dodging bullets” and “putting out fires,” and scandals rack up “body counts.”

It will probably be twenty years or more before we know what kind of body count was racked up outside the White House. Governments tend to be very protective of their secrets regarding weapons of mass destruction (WMD), Valerie Plame’s specialty as an undercover CIA operative.

When “senior administration officials” blew her cover for the sake of a good political jab, they also blew the cover of the CIA front company that ostensibly employed her. That blew the cover of an unknown number of other undercover operatives. We haven’t heard their names, but you can be certain that foreign intelligence services, who pay very close attention to matters like this, know who they are. Those foreign intelligence services also tend to keep a close watch on the people in their own WMD programs, so they’ve learned who was talking to undercover CIA operatives.

Now we’re talking body counts.