November 2006

Politics

Comments (0)

Permalink

Trapped!

Dan Froomkin in the Washington Post:

President Bush’s foremost political liability going into the mid-term elections is that the American people aren’t happy he took the nation to war in Iraq and don’t believe he has a way out.

In other words, they think Bush made a mess and has no idea how to clean it up.

Now, in what may be the ultimate show of Karl Rovian chutzpah, Bush is righteously attacking Democrats for not having a plan to clean up the mess he himself made.

Let’s see: if Democrats say what they will do if they win the election, they’re prematurely “measuring their drapes.”

If Democrats don’t say, unanimously and in great detail, exactly what they will do if they win, they have “no plan.”

Oh, no! The Democrats have walked straight into another brilliant Rove trap! (He is a genius, you know.)

Politics

Comments (0)

Permalink

Ignorance Is Not Bliss

Linda Ellerbee of Nick News, Nickelodeon’s news show for kids, on the NewsHour:

If we have “messages” on Nick News, it comes down to three:

One: Ignorance is not bliss…

Two: That wherever you find bad things happening, you will always find good people trying to make it better.

And the last one is that we are probably all more alike than we are different.

Nick News will air a special election report called “Cheap Shots and Low Blows” on Sunday evening at 8:30 eastern time. The discussion should be more enlightening than most of the cable news shows.

Politics

Comments (0)

Permalink

Ron Reagan on Colbert

Ron Reagan, who supports stem cell research, put forth a really whacky idea on The Colbert Report:

Most scientists who are working this field will tell you that embryonic stem cell research is the way to go, and I tend to trust people who know what they’re talking about.

That’s never gonna fly in the modern Republican Party.

Reagan: President Bush does seem to like the idea of pretending to be someone else, and that somebody else seems to be my father.

Colbert: Isn’t the president, in some ways, all of our fathers? And he’s driving us to freedom, and we’re in the back seat, and he’s saying, “Shut up and let me drive!”

Democracy is for Iraqis. We’re just not ready for it here.

Politics

Comments (0)

Permalink

Bushwa

Via Boing Boing: Chirag Mehta visually maps out “the popularity, frequency, and trends in the usages of words within speeches, official documents, declarations, and letters written by the Presidents of the US between 1776 – 2006 AD.” The results are enlightening and sometimes — but not always –surprising.

Word frequency in recent Bush speech

Politics

Comments (0)

Permalink

By an Oversight, Oversight. Kill It!

A government auditor in Iraq will have to close up shop:

Investigations led by a Republican lawyer named Stuart W. Bowen Jr. in Iraq have sent American occupation officials to jail on bribery and conspiracy charges, exposed disastrously poor construction work by well-connected companies like Halliburton and Parsons, and discovered that the military did not properly track hundreds of thousands of weapons it shipped to Iraqi security forces.

And tucked away in a huge military authorization bill that President Bush signed two weeks ago is what some of Mr. Bowen’s supporters believe is his reward for repeatedly embarrassing the administration: a pink slip.

The order comes in the form of an obscure provision that terminates his federal oversight agency, the Office of the Special Inspector General for Iraq Reconstruction, on Oct. 1, 2007. The clause was inserted by the Republican side of the House Armed Services Committee over the objections of Democratic counterparts during a closed-door conference, and it has generated surprise and some outrage among lawmakers who say they had no idea it was in the final legislation.

What an oversight! Somehow, a tiny bit of oversight got into Iraq. Well, nobody is allowed to shed light on this administration’s handling of Iraq. Not Congress, not an auditor, not anybody.

See, the kind of tyranny the Bush administration is trying to establish is very delicate. It can’t flourish in the light.

Politics

Comments (0)

Permalink

Insanity

A campaign ad for Ned Lamont:

It’s not just Lieberman repeatedly making the same disastrous mistakes.

Politics

Comments (0)

Permalink

Lame These Ducks

George W. Bush says Democrats have no plan:

Weakened by the unpopular Iraq war, President George W. Bush accused Democrats of lacking a plan to win it on Monday as he opened a weeklong drive to maintain Republican control of the U.S. Congress.

He wants Donald Rumsfeld to stay to the bitter end:

President Bush said Wednesday he wants Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld and Vice President Dick Cheney to remain in his administration until the end of his presidency, extending a job guarantee to two of the most-criticized members of his team.

In case you forgot, Rumsfeld is the man with no plan:

Long before the United States invaded Iraq in 2003, Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld forbade military strategists to develop plans for securing a postwar Iraq, the retiring commander of the Army Transportation Corps said [in September].

In fact, said Brig. Gen. Mark Scheid, Rumsfeld said “he would fire the next person” who talked about the need for a postwar plan.

Well, uh… let’s see. Rumsfeld’s “no plan” is better than the Democrats’ lack of a plan because it’s intentional — that’s it! And Rumsfeld’s No Plan Plan has a track record. Why, just look at how well it’s working out:

A classified briefing prepared two weeks ago by the United States Central Command portrays Iraq as edging toward chaos, in a chart that the military is using as a barometer of civil conflict. …Military chart: Index of Civil Conflict

It shows a sharp escalation in sectarian violence since the bombing of a Shiite shrine in Samarra in February, and tracks a further worsening this month despite a concerted American push to tamp down the violence in Baghdad.

In fashioning the index, the military is weighing factors like the ineffectual Iraqi police and the dwindling influence of moderate religious and political figures, rather than more traditional military measures such as the enemy’s fighting strength and the control of territory.

The conclusions the Central Command has drawn from these trends are not encouraging, according to a copy of the slide that was obtained by The New York Times. The slide shows Iraq as moving sharply away from “peace,” an ideal on the far left side of the chart, to a point much closer to the right side of the spectrum, a red zone marked “chaos.” As depicted in the command’s chart, the needle has been moving steadily toward the far right of the chart.

Considering this track record, and Bush’s determination to stick with the author of the No Plan Plan, our course now is clear: we’ve got to lame these ducks!

Funnies
Politics

Comments (0)

Permalink

Get MAD, Get Even

We Stand by Our President!

The current MAD magazine caught my eye.

Follow the link and you can click the image to see a bigger version of the cover, or download a PDF file with a full-sized version of the cover.

(Their Fanatic Four poster is worth checking out, too.)

This is an old one, but also appropriate in this election season: If Bush Was Running Against Jesus.

Funnies
Politics

Comments (0)

Permalink

Slanderman

From This Modern World, an exceedingly timely cartoon by Tom Tomorrow:

Slanderman and Defamation Boy

Politics

Comments (2)

Permalink

Voter Eligibility Test

Via Coyote Gulch: Should you vote next Tuesday? DontVote.org has a test for you.

DontVote.org’s mission is to combat the “Get out the Vote” movement that is pushed by organizations that would like to increase the number of uneducated voters to help their cause. DontVote.org encourages people to Vote, but only AFTER they have educated themselves on the policies and individuals for which they are voting. Voting should be considered a privilege and exercised with responsibility and discretion. Just like a final exam, responsible voting requires self-education and thought. When the time comes to cast your ballot, if you don’t know for what or whom you’re voting, then DON’T VOTE.

When you finish the test, check out the percentages who got each question right.

You have to wonder how the nearly two per cent who didn’t recognize the first picture are voting.