Newsweek columnist Anna Quindlen says an emergency contraceptive named Plan B may shed light on what the abortion battle is really about:
Feminist advocates have always suspected that the anti-abortion movement is less motivated by the sanctity of life than by opposition to women’s rights. The fate of Plan B could settle the issue. Emergency contraception is the ultimate middle ground in an issue in which the middle has often seemed to be a black hole. One study has estimated that if Plan B were easily available, it could cut the number of abortions by half.
Yet the American Life League, the far-right wing of the anti-abortion movement, has said the organization is opposed not only to emergency contraception, but to any oral contraceptives or IUDs because they constitute “early abortions.” In Colorado, rape victims aren’t even told about emergency contraception in the ER. The governor, Bill Owens, said that to require hospitals to do so would raise “serious concerns” for Roman Catholics like himself, concerns more important than those of a woman carrying a rapist’s child.
…
If easy access to a pill that has been shown to significantly decrease the number of abortions is not a welcome development, what is the real point of the anti-abortion exercise? Is it to safeguard life, or to safeguard an outdated status quo in which biology was destiny and motherhood was an obligation, not an avocation? America leads the industrialized world in its abortion rate. Perhaps that is because it leads in hypocrisy as well.
Post a Comment
No personal attacks on any of the participants here.