But Randall Munroe’s webcomic xkcd makes an excellent point:

More harm has been done by people panicked over societal decline than societal decline ever did.

By George, he’s got something there. You can click the image to see the complete comic.

Those who aren’t already familiar with xkcd might be startled by the crude stick-figure drawings, or by the crude language sometimes present in the comics. I think those things are simply evidence of society’s decline and inevitable collapse, but I could be wrong.

Your house is on fire. Guy goes, “Ahhh! My child!” Guy runs in, takes your kid out, saves their life. Now is not the time to accuse them of kidnapping. This is the situation that we face.

The right-wingers have called Obama a Socialist, a Communist, a Fascist, a terrorist, and worse. I expect them to call him a kidnapper within 72 hours.

His administration was too short for us to know what kind of president he might have become, but I think he had one quality that’s rare among American politicians: he could recognize when he was playing a game that couldn’t be won, and stop playing it.

We tend to reward politicians who mouth the expected national pieties, and penalize those who “think outside the box.” But when he saw that the old game wasn’t working — couldn’t work — Kennedy tried to change the game. The Cuban Missile Crisis of October 1962 brought the U.S. and the Soviet Union to the brink of a nuclear exchange that might have meant the extinction of the human race. Having gazed into that particular abyss, Kennedy knew that we had to find a different way forward.

On June 10, 1963, at a commencement address at American University, Kennedy spoke about peace in the era of the atom bomb.

I am talking about genuine peace, the kind of peace that makes life on earth worth living, and the kind that enables men and nations to grow, and to hope, and build a better life for their children — not merely peace for Americans but peace for all men and women, not merely peace in our time but peace in all time.

I speak of peace because of the new face of war. Total war makes no sense in an age where great powers can maintain large and relatively invulnerable nuclear forces and refuse to surrender without resort to those forces. It makes no sense in an age where a single nuclear weapon contains almost ten times the explosive force delivered by all the allied air forces in the Second World War. It makes no sense in an age when the deadly poisons produced by a nuclear exchange would be carried by wind and water and soil and seed to the far corners of the globe and to generations yet unborn.

…

Some say that it is useless to speak of peace … until the leaders of the Soviet Union adopt a more enlightened attitude. I hope they do. I believe we can help them do it. But I also believe that we must reexamine our own attitudes, as individuals and as a Nation, for our attitude is as essential as theirs…

First examine our attitude towards peace itself. Too many of us think it is impossible. Too many think it is unreal. But that is a dangerous, defeatist belief. It leads to the conclusion that war is inevitable, that mankind is doomed, that we are gripped by forces we cannot control. We need not accept that view. Our problems are manmade; therefore, they can be solved by man. And man can be as big as he wants. No problem of human destiny is beyond human beings. Man’s reason and spirit have often solved the seemingly unsolvable, and we believe they can do it again…

There is no single, simple key to this peace; no grand or magic formula to be adopted by one or two powers. Genuine peace must be the product of many nations, the sum of many acts. It must be dynamic, not static, changing to meet the challenge of each new generation. For peace is a process — a way of solving problems.

With such a peace, there will still be quarrels and conflicting interests, as there are within families and nations. World peace, like community peace, does not require that each man love his neighbor, it requires only that they live together in mutual tolerance, submitting their disputes to a just and peaceful settlement. And history teaches us that enmities between nations, as between individuals, do not last forever. However fixed our likes and dislikes may seem, the tide of time and events will often bring surprising changes in the relations between nations and neighbors. So let us persevere. Peace need not be impracticable, and war need not be inevitable…

[Extreme Soviet statements about American intentions offer] a warning to the American people not to fall into the same trap as the Soviets, not to see only a distorted and desperate view of the other side, not to see conflict as inevitable, accommodation as impossible, and communication as nothing more than an exchange of threats.

No government or social system is so evil that its people must be considered as lacking in virtue. As Americans, we find communism profoundly repugnant as a negation of personal freedom and dignity. But we can still hail the Russian people for their many achievements in science and space, in economic and industrial growth, in culture, in acts of courage.

Among the many traits the peoples of our two countries have in common, none is stronger than our mutual abhorrence of war. Almost unique among the major world powers, we have never been at war with each other. And no nation in the history of battle ever suffered more than the Soviet Union in the Second World War. At least 20 million lost their lives. Countless millions of homes and families were burned or sacked. A third of the nation’s territory, including two thirds of its industrial base, was turned into a wasteland — a loss equivalent to the destruction of this country east of Chicago.

…

So let us not be blind to our differences, but let us also direct attention to our common interests and the means by which those differences can be resolved. And if we cannot end now our differences, at least we can help make the world safe for diversity. For in the final analysis, our most basic common link is that we all inhabit this small planet. We all breathe the same air. We all cherish our children’s futures. And we are all mortal.

It’s a Cold War speech. We face different challenges now. But it remains true that we must find a way to live together on this small planet, and we are all mortal.

Video, audio, and the published text of the speech (not an accurate transcript) are available here. A more accurate transcript is here.

Raw, unencumbered capitalism is a wonderful engine, but how we mistook it for a social framework — for how to build a just society — and interpreted it as that, is just incredible. —David Simon

So it’s not just in science fiction that we turn control of our society over to the machines?

If you’re as old as I am, you may even remember harmonica bands. Unless your memory is going.

He might have attended Barack Obama’s inauguration tomorrow in person. As it is, he will be unmistakably present in spirit.

I’ve posted this video before. It seems appropriate now. Martin Luther King in Montgomery, Alabama, on March 25, 1965:

Stanford has the full text of the speech.

The video is from the film King: A Filmed Record… Montgomery to Memphis, which was shown in theaters as a “one-time only” event on March 24, 1970, and was later aired just once on network television. A truncated version of the film was once available on home video, and now the full film is being made available on DVD by A Filmed Record, Inc., a non-profit company. The DVD is pretty expensive, but it’s been awaited for a very long time.

Perhaps a better way to assess a man’s character is to look at those who dislike him. …

Pat Buchanan, Bob Novak, and Watergate burglar G. Gordon Liddy don’t like Mark Felt. Mark Felt is truly a great man.

Mark Felt died on Thursday.

It’s your turn to play election judge. Tell us how you would rule in the case of these challenged ballots.

Educational. It’s not always obvious how a particular ballot should be counted, but it’s enlightening to see the contortions both campaigns are willing to use in hopes of gaining an advantage in a squeaker of an election.

Several newspapers nationwide increased their normal press runs and, when even those sold out, printed special editions.

The Newseum has an online gallery of front pages from over 700 newspapers from all over the world.

From the front lines of Iraq to more genteel spots like Harry’s Bar in Paris, the election of Barack Obama unlocked a floodgate of hope that a new American leader will redeem promises of change, rewrite the political script and, perhaps as important as anything else, provide a kind of leadership that will erase the bitterness of the Bush years.

No, really — the whole world, as seen in this exclusive documentary image at The Joy of Tech — click the image to see the complete cartoon.